Daniel Neal December 6 2012

Software functions bought to, and adopted by, professionals need to have regular updates. I am not speaking about bug fixes, although that's always nice too; I am speaking about new features and improved functionality. It would even be nice to know the people making the instruments you utilize to earn your paycheck are listening and getting suggestions from many individuals throughout the enhancing spectrum. Not doing so is precisely one of many things that got Avid into bother a couple of years again and I fear its beginning to happen with Apple. The <a href="http://surfpk.com/apples-next-move-without-jobs/-0346">secretive nature of Apple's</a>product development makes many in the editorial world feel as their requests are simply bouncing off the partitions of an echo chamber. Don't get me incorrect; I respect Apple's selections to develop their software any way they want, and I nonetheless use Last Lower for sure enhancing tasks. But a chilly, exhausting fact is that in the ten years since it's launch, Last Lower Pro has not gained as a lot traction in the feature film and television worlds as Apple's advertising may need you believe. The prevailing sentiment of professional editors is that the dearth of upgrades, feature shortcomings and, dare I say it, idiosyncrasies of Last Lower Pro make it a distant second to cutting on an Avid.